Original Article: Revealed: 20 al-Qaeda suspects on Scots hit-list
Note from Robert Spencer:
Of course, we have this from human rights lawyer Aamer Anwar: "None of the people on
this list are terrorists. They are ordinary people who are being persecuted." Once again, it would
be more credible if Muslim activists could admit to the existence of at least one Islamic
terrorist somewhere in the world. Otherwise, this sort of thing just becomes part of the background
noise whenever arrests or law-enforcement efforts are made. From The Scotsman, with thanks to Teri
In the first tape of Bin Laden made after 9/11/2001, he is shown exhibiting a kind
of cosy mirth with his associates. He has one question for a visitor who appears from
the outside world: how is the rate of conversion (reversion) to Islam going? He is delighted
to learn (wrongly, as it turns out) that the rate of conversion to Islam in Holland,
for example, has shot up after the attacks.
Why is this not a detail but significant? One forgets thatBin Laden's goal is not terrorism;
that is a mere tactic; his goal is to ensure that the conditions for the spread
of Islam across the globe (not all at once, of course -- Western Europe most susceptible
to Da'wa, black Africa most susceptible to outright force, East Asia hardly susceptible at all to
either) are created.
For Bin Laden, as for Tariq Ramadan (just given a three-year professorship at Notre Dame, where
his careful attempt to separate Christianity from its roots in Judaism can proceed, funded by American
Christian donors to a 501(c)(3) non-profit, without much hindrance, as he attempts to conduct his sly
Da'wa.
These articles on terrorists are important, but they should not obscure the larger question. Islam is
a danger and a failure. Though left-wing critics such as Hitchens like to talk about "Islamofascism"
-- as if this were simply an illegitimate mutant of Islamic doctrine -- Islam itself is
profoundly akin to Fascism in many ways. In this connection, one ought to read, to familiarize
oneself with, and to distribute to those capable of thought, the essay by Ibn Warraq on
"Islam, the Middle East, and Fascism" (simply google "Ibn Warraq" "Islam" and "Fascism" simultaneously),
Terrorism gets the attention. Da'wa, and demographic conquest from within Western Europe and ultimately North America
(the glittering prize) is the real threat. If Islam is not understood, or if those who
are listened to belong to the small army of apologists, both Muslim and non-Muslim, so that
a real understanding is prevented (it is extraordinary that most of those in whose hands the
teaching of undergraduates about Islam has been entrusted are themselves such apologists; their presentation of the
matter is slyly designed to win over, and misinform, ignorant undergraduates, taught to trust their professors,
and unwilling to believe that wholesale propaganzing can be taking place -- but it is, and
right under the negligent eyes of alumni, parents, and of course the fearful administrations, whose faculty
deans and presidents do not believe they know enough about Islam, to be able to judge
for themselves, and in any case are fearful of getting into that hornets' nest.
It is as if, in 1939, all those teaching international relations and European history were presentable
proponents of the idea that Germans had been "terribly humiliated" by World War I, that the
English in particular had caused the Weimar Republic unemployment, that Germans deserved whatever Lebensraum they demanded,
and that HItler wanted peace, peace, only peace -- and that just as today Tariq Ramadan
tells us soothingly that all that ails modern Western man can be successfully treated by the
"reversion" to Islam -- indeed, as he was born in the WEst, and vastly prefers the
West (without realizing that what is good about the West comes precisely out of its Judeo-Christian
civilization, and would not, for one minute, survive under Islam -- much less have been produced
in a Muslim world), he likes to insist that the real heart of Islam will be
that West, and not the Middle East that, secretly, he cannot bear, and cannot admit to
himself why he cannot bear it (Islam itself is the problem).
But that is what is happening, and the only way to change things is the power
of the purse -- alumni must withhold contributions until university administrations begin, with the help of
students, to monitor what is being fed to students in courses relative to Islam, what books
they read, what is said in class; students should be permitted to tape-record any class --
well, let those class tapes be listened to. If anyone shrieks about "academic free speech" then
one can simply raise, as a matter of national security, the deliberate and systematic use of
the classroom for sly propaganda. Let the American Association of University Professors, like the ACLU, take
on the wrong issue. Let the professors be made to worry that their refusal to examine
the real tenets of Islam will now be subject to review, and one can even provide
a list of ten essential matters that can be examined: Jihad, dhimmitude, the division of the
world between dar al-Islam and dar al-Harb, the Treaty of al-Hudaibiyya, the treatment of apostates under
Islam, the "Jizya" and all other legal disabilities imposed on non-Muslims (including those who were permited
to be treated as "honorary" ahl al-Kitab, Zoroastrians and Hindus -- who were more valuable as
live dhimmis paying to support their Muslim conquerors), the treatment of women (and here the work
done by Azam Kamquian and others should be available to students), the ability of Islam to
change, or to be re-interepreted; the life of Muhammad in all of its detail (Aisha, the
slaughter of the Bani Qurayza, everything -- not simply the wonderful "pax Islamica" he supposedly brought
to he warring tribes of the Arabian peninsula; recent studies in the origins of Islam (Wansbrough,
Crone, Cook, Luxenberg, and so on); Islam and human rights (here the Iranian exiles, such as
Reza Afshari, are unanwersable and unanswered).
In other words, the days when the study of Islam were to be relegated to those
practicing taqiyya or kitman, some not out of maliciousness but out of their own filial piety,
or even at times ignorance, have to go. Back to the days of Arthur Jeffery, Margoliouth,
Joseph Schacht, and all the great scholars of Islam who, in the current environment, would never
last in academic life, and would be run out town on a rail. Real scholarship now
has to be found, in this field, outside the regular departments, among those somehow able to
find support.
It can be done. It must be done. The time for nonsense and lies is over.
|