Original Article: "Every Mujahid in Iraq is a member of Al Qaeda"
Note from Robert Spencer:
In the Arabic-language Al-Wasat magazine, a revealing interview with a jihadist. From the SITE Institute, with thanks to Jeffrey Imm:
Undue emphasis has been placed on the figure of Osama bin Laden, and the
need to "get him." This reinforces the silly idea of America as a country
with a "cowboy" president, out to get the "bad guy." (The phrase "bad guy"
is what American soldiers in Iraq are forced to use; they are not permitted
to understand that the enemy is Islam, Islamic tenets, Islamic believers -- no, just
"bad guys").
By elevating Bin Laden's importance, and expending so much effort on locating him, one
is helping to aid the Jihad. For now, when he is captured or killed,
it will make not the slightest difference; the tenets of Islam still exist; al-Jazeera
still exists; the audiotapes and videotapes, based on Qur'an and hadith, still exist.
And by focusing on Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, the American government is unintentionally
helping to delay recognition that the threat comes not from one group, but from
hundreds of groups, or from no group at all -- just a Muslim who,
whatever his grievance, because he has a prepared prism (Islam) through which to view
the universe, will take out that grievance on the Infidels, in one way or
another.
The American government needs to find a cadre of people who understand what Islam
is all about, are unafraid to identify it, and not "a handful of extremists"
as the permanent threat, to identify as well all the instruments of Jihad, including
those that do not involve "terrorism" and are, in the end, because less spectacular,
far more dangerous.
It is infuriating to see how the Western world is behaving. It is not
only the appeasers, and the sauve-qui-peut philosophers of Europe, who cannot admit to their
own populations the folly of what they have permitted (the millions of Muslim immigrants,
which are now a permanent threat unless mass expulsions are undertaken, and that can
only happen if the intellectual ground is prepared), nor the sheer idiocy of the
Euro-Arab Dialogue which has become, essentially, a vehicle for the appeasement of Arab demands,
and for the adoption of Arab attitudes in the Jihad against Israel -- perhaps
in order to buy time (it will do the opposite), perhaps in the dreamy
hope that somehow, Islamic tenets cannot possibly be what all those Cassandras on places
like Jihadwatch say they are, but really if only we placate them by throwing
Israel to the wolves (and that becomes easier if all of your media has
for decades, and with ever-greater meretriciousness, been engaged in misreporting events involving Israel so
that, little by little, drop by deadly drop, the stillicide of vilification manages to
carve out its little depression, in which there now lies a pool of fetid
hate.
Less attention to Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawihiri, doing their imitation of Muhammad
and the best of his Companions somewhere in Waziristan, and much more to rallying
those in Western Europe who are desperate for transatlantic moral, intellectual, and even financial
support -- akin to that received by anti-Communists in western Europe after World War
II -- is far more important.
Osama Bin Ladens are if not a dime a dozen, at least easily replaceable.
Pooh-pooh his importance, diminish his place in history. There are plenty of Bin Ladens,
and there always will be. The trick is to make sure that no Muslim
polity, state or group, has any major weaponry, and to identify ways to put
such pressure on Muslim states that, whatever their secret and eternal sympathies, they will
no longer fund mosques and madrasas, no longer take the risk of engaging in
Jihad --it is simply a question of reading them the riot act, and doing
everything possible to make the world of Islam recognize the failures -- political, economic,
intellectual, and moral -- of Islam. It can be done. It is not beyond
the wit of Infidel man.
Look to the roots of the problem -- roots which cannot be exitrpated, but
can constantly be cut back, again and again and again, while the perception of
the precise threat of Islam is explained to enough innocent Infidels, and the precise
failures of Islam are demonstrated (but not explained) to a sufficient number of intelligent
Muslims who may feel keenly their being cut off from the West, its educational
possibilities, its health care, all the sheer wonderfulness of it that they both love
and hate, without being able to reconcile the two. Well, as long as "hate"
is in the equation, and there is no open recognition and admission of what
Islam teaches, those Muslims will have to suffer as well -- forced to endure
the sole society of the True Believers, until such time as they, those Muslims,
act in the Ataturkian model. We cannot change Islamic doctrines. No one can. But
the practice can be so tied down, roped in, constrained that it will, little
by little, lose adherents and loyalties.
And the Special-Formula Roundup that Ataturk concocted to tend, and cause to flourish, his
Turkish Kemalist garden (think tulips, and turbans, and the bulbuls of Gulistan) -- well,
you can still pick up a large bottle of the stuff right here, at
this website. No charge for shipping and handling.
Get with the program, Pentagon, will you?
|